|
Sweet Home 3D Forum » List all forums » » Forum: Sweet Home 3D bar » » » Thread: Photo rendering test |
||
| Print at Feb 3, 2026, 8:19:46 AM |
|
|
| Posted by Miker777 at Sep 26, 2016, 9:30:41 PM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test Thank you enkonyito Any render that takes more than 3 or 4 games of solitaire is too long for me. ![]() |
| Posted by enkonyito at Sep 27, 2016, 6:18:45 PM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test @Martin It's a little joke,because it looks like indirect light,but it's not true. My settings were PATH-0...but ENHANCED EXTERNAL BRIGHT...and in combination with sS-SILK and shining walls it looks like this... Nice trick to simulate indirect light with a rendering time less long! ![]() You discovered that the Enhance external brightness option brings light to the interior of a room with large openings. ![]() image size: 600 x 450 pixels advanced settings: aAmax 1, gI default, dB 0, sS glossy without Enhance external brightness option (rendering time: 16min 57.9s) with Enhance external brightness option (rendering time: 35min 14.1s) ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by MartinSK at Oct 1, 2016, 9:54:40 PM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test Here is another image I made of my friend's new bathroom I create in style of 50's. There is no trick here. It's a combination of IPR and indirect light... I am happy that it is really possible to create very photorealistic pictures here with 1.3.1 renderer... settings here... GI path DB 1 algorythm IPR picture size 6000x4000px then resized to 1000x667px time rendering 13 hours 30 minutes ![]() |
| Posted by enkonyito at Oct 3, 2016, 5:56:55 PM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test I like the shiny effect and the reflection of light on the wall. ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by enkonyito at Mar 22, 2017, 4:12:14 AM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test This test concerns sunsky or ibl samples. (PVR means PhotoVideoRendering plug-in) aerial view virtual visit ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by bdfd at Mar 22, 2017, 7:58:25 AM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test Hi enkonyito, Great work ! On aerial view, I prefer the third. Same thing for virtual visit. But I'm a question, PVR 1.1, why not PVR 1.3.2 ? ![]() ---------------------------------------- Evil progresses when good people do nothing! --- SH3D 7.1 and nothing else - W11 64b in 4K |
| Posted by enkonyito at Mar 23, 2017, 5:02:10 PM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test But I'm a question, PVR 1.1, why not PVR 1.3.2 ? As shown here , the PhotoVideoRendering-1.0 plug-in is completely compatible with SH3D-5.3 (Managed transformations applied on texture coordinates).The effect of the option "Enhance external brightness" depends on the image used for the sky or the time of day. ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by enkonyito at Jan 7, 2018, 4:23:23 AM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test These tests concern the modification of the number of sky samples (ImageBasedLight, SunSkyLight) and indirect light (PathTracingGIEngine). These use the configuration aAmin = aAmax = 0 to determine the max value of samples that offers the best quality. The max value for ibl samples is 512. The max value for sunsky samples is 512. The max value for path samples is 512. For sunsky samples and path samples, quality is inherent to the value of aAmax. As the sunflow doc suggests, the max samples value is divided by the corresponding number of samples (aAmin = aAmax). You can use the PVR-1.4 beta version to test these changes as well as the minimum night brightness . ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by enkonyito at May 26, 2018, 3:49:57 AM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test Example of using the light panels created for version 1.5 of the PhotoVideoRendering plug-in. ---------------------------------------- EnkoNyito |
| Posted by Ceciliabr at May 27, 2018, 6:56:49 PM |
|
Re: Photo rendering test This looks like something I would love to get my hands on cec |
|
|
|
Current timezone is GMT Feb 3, 2026, 8:19:46 AM |